
WHY
DID BERKELEY ADD ONLY #1 AND #2 PLASTIC BOTTLES TO THE PROGRAM?
One
factor that complicates plastic recycling is that many different types
of plastic are used in consumer packaging. Each plastic behaves differently
when you try to recycle it, and some plastics can't be recycled at all.
For these reasons, plastics must be sorted by type before manufacturers
can use it again to make a new product. The plastics industry uses a
numbering system to group plastic packaging into seven general categories
(see sidebar). Of these seven, only #1 PET and #2 HDPE narrow-necked
bottles are commonly collected and recycled into new material. (95%
of the bottles in California are #1 or #2 narrow-necked.) Some communities
collect #1 through #7 plastics in the belief that more #1 and #2 bottles
will be collected and recycled if customers don't have to worry anbout
the numbers. But the #3 through #7 plastic is often discarded. In Berkeley,
we decided this approach would mislead the public.
WHY
CAN'T MY YOGURT CUP BE RECYCLED? IT HAS A #2 ON THE BOTTOM, JUST LIKE
THE MILK JUG YOU ACCEPT. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE? Many
types of plastic containers such as yogurt cups, plastic bags, styrofoam,
take-out food containers and wide-mouth bottles, are not recyclable.
So even though your yogurt cup may have a #2 embossed on the bottom
inside the chasing arrow symbol, that doesn't necessarily mean it's
recyclable. The number on the bottom of the container indicates the
general category of plastic it's made from. Although a yogurt cup may
be made of #2 plastic, (the same type of material as a recyclable milk
jug or bleach bottle), it contains different dyes, plasticizers, UV
inhibitors, softeners, and other chemicals required to shape it into
a cup. This mix of additives changes the properties of the plastic and
make it incompatible with the plastic used to make bottles. Currently,
there is little demand for the yogurt cup type of plastic on its own.
Adding to the confusion, the plastics industry's use of the chasing
arrows symbol with its numbering system leads some people to believe
that any container with arrows is recyclable. The industry says it never
intended the symbol to indicate that a container was recyclable or had
recycled content, but simply used it as a catchy graphic to highlight
the identifying number. Recyclers requested that plastic container manufacturers
change the graphic since it is misleading, but the industry has resisted
efforts to modify it.
WHAT
HAPPENS TO THE PLASTIC BOTTLES THAT ARE COLLECTED?
Few local markets exist for turning plastic bottles
back into bottles. Right now, Berkeley sells plastic for end uses such
as lumber and fiber for various products. Although this is an alternative
to landfilling it, ideally we would prefer an approach where all plastic
bottles go back to a manufacturer for creation into new bottles. Not
so long ago, we bought soda in glass bottles and returned them to the
store to get our dime back. Those bottles were returned to the bottling
plant, cleaned and reused. Bottles that were not reusable were recycled
that is, the glass was melted down and used to make new bottles. This
is an example of "closed loop" recycling. "Closed loop" means that materials,
(in this case glass), are kept out of the landfill and used over and
over again. (Hence, the chasing arrows symbol.) Closed loop recycling
is the most sustainable form of recycling and prevents the further mining
of natural resources. Glass and metals can be recycled over and over,
theoretically staying out of the landfill forever. Paper, too, can be
recycled many times over. Most plastic, however, cannot be recycled
in such a "closed loop" manner because it degrades significantly in
the recycling process. Closed loop plastic recycling will not be a reality
until the plastics industry buys recaptured plastic and recycles it
back into its original packaging.
IS
IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE A PLASTIC BOTTLE BACK INTO ANOTHER PLASTIC BOTTLE?
Yes.
Some European countries require that soda bottles made of #1 plastic
be made back into bottles. Although the technology exists to use recaptured
plastic, little has been done in the United States because of cost,
lack of incentive, and packagers' and grocery manufacturers' preference
for new or "virgin" plastic. Additionally, there are challenges keeping
nonrecyclable plastics (#3 through #7) from mixing with and contaminating
loads of #1 or #2 plastics during processing. The American Plastics
Council (APC) continues to promote plastics recycling as easy, economical,
and successful while simultaneously encouraging the use of more and
more plastic. In one eight month period, the APC spent $18 million in
a national advertising campaign to "Take Another Look at Plastics."
According to the Environmental Defense Fund, during that same time,
while 15 billion pounds of plastic were produced, only 1 billion were
taken back and recycled. The growth of new plastic products continued
to outpace the growth of plastic product recycling by a factor of 14
to 1.1
AREN'T
THERE ADVANTAGES TO REPLACING HEAVY GLASS BOTTLES WITH LIGHTWEIGHT PLASTIC
BOTTLES?
While
using lightweight plastic for packaging improves shipping efficiency
and durability, there are environmental tradeoffs. Based on the EPA's
1994 Toxic Release Inventory, the plastics industry annually contributes
14% of the national total of toxic releases to the atmosphere.2
Producing a 16-oz. #1 bottle generates more than 100 times the amount
of toxic emissions than making the same size bottle out of glass.3
IF
WE CANNOT "CLOSE THE LOOP" WHEN RECYCLING PLASTIC PACKAGING,
ISN'T MAKING PLASTIC INTO PRODUCTS LIKE LUMBER GOOD ENOUGH?
Although plastic lumber and fiber represent a
destination for recovered plastic and provide some environmental benefit,
making these materials does not decrease resource extraction for making
new plastic packaging. New plastic must continually be made to keep
up with the demand for plastic packaging used today. If manufacturers
reincorporate plastic in their packaging, the need for resource extraction
will diminish. There are some encouraging examples. The rug industry,
for instance, uses both recycled and virgin plastic to make polyester
fiber and has shown commendable initiative by taking back their worn
carpeting for recycling. Computer manufacturers are working cooperatively
to redesign their products for easy dismantling, reuse of components
and recyclability. In addition, some office furniture companies take
back their products, which contain a lot of plastic. Together these
actions are part of what is now called "Manufacturer
Responsibility."
|
PVC: The Poison
Plastic
PVC or Polyvinyl Chloride
(#3) has many harmful environmental effects. PVC is used in plumbing
pipe, shrink wrap, outdoor furniture, some water bottles, and
salad dressing bottles. Greenpeace has been working to eliminate
the production of PVC, because its manufacturing processes consume
approximately 30% of the chlorine used in industrial processes
and release many other toxic chemicals, some of which accumulate
in the body.
Recycling groups are concerned
about PVC, because a small amount can severely contaminate large
loads of PET (#1) plastic. PVC strongly resembles PET. If PVC
is accidentally incorporated in a load of material being processed
for recycling, a release of potentially toxic compounds can occur.
Disposal of PVC also presents
problems. PVC is widely used for medical purposes. Medical waste
is usually disposed of through incineration. Incineration of
PVC can release dioxin, which is a carcinogen. Currently,
medical waste is being incinerated in East Oakland. Contact Green
Action for more information about the coalition of neighborhood
residents, local teachers, and environmentalists that is working
to stop this burning. As a consumer, you can help by avoiding
purchase of PVC bottles (look for the #3), telling your retailer
why you aren't buying brands with PVC, and keeping any PVC bottles
you might end up with out of the recycling box.
|
1
Environmental Defense Fund, "Something to hide: The sorry state of
plastics recycling," October 21, 1997.
2 Developing Local
Markets for Post-Consumer Rigid PET and HDPE Containers in the East
Bay, Oakland Recycling Assn., Oakland, CA 1995.
3 CSG/Tellus
Packaging Study: "Assessing the Impacts of Production and Disposal of
PackagingÉ" US Environmental Protection Agency and the New Jersey Department
of Environmental Protection and Energy, Boston, MA, May 1992.
|