• About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
    • Hours & Directions
    • EC in the News
    • Job Openings
    • Web Advertising
  • Programs
    • Berkeley Curbside Recycling
    • Ecology Center Farmers' Markets
    • EcoHouse Demonstration Home
    • Ecology Center Store
    • Farm Fresh Choice
    • EcoCalendar
    • EcoDirectory
    • Information Services
    • Climate Change Action
  • Projects
    • Fiscal Sponsorship FAQ
    • Bay Area Coalition for Headwaters (BACH)
    • Bay Area Seed Interchange Library (BASIL)
    • Berkeley Community Gardening Collaborative
    • Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA)
    • Indigenous Permaculture Project
    • West Berkeley Alliance for Clean Air and Safe Jobs
  • Get Involved
    • Classes & Events
    • Job Openings
    • Volunteer & Intern
    • Become a Member!
  • Resources
    • EcoCalendar
    • EcoDirectory
    • Fact Sheets
    • Library
    • Newsletter
    • Blog
  • Support Us
Ecology Center

Plastics Task Force


"Report of the Berkeley Plastics Task Force"

April 8, 1996

11. CONCLUSIONS

1. Plastic packaging offers advantages such as flexibility and light weight, but it creates problems including consumption of fossil resources, pollution, and high energy use in manufacturing; accumulation of wasted plastic in the environment; migration of polymers and additives into foods; and an abundance of public misinformation about plastics issues.

2. Curbside collection of discarded plastics is expensive and has limited benefits in reducing environmental impacts, diverting resources from waste, or achieving mandated recycling goals. Residential curbside collection in Berkeley would capture only about 132 tons a year - less than one-half of one percent of municipal discards.

3. It is likely that establishing plastics collection would increase consumption by making plastic appear more ecologically friendly both to consumers and retailers. By making plastics seem ecologically friendly, collecting plastics at curbside would legitimize the production and marketing of packaging made from virgin plastic. But much of this packaging is in fact unrecyclable, so the effect could be a net increase in the amount of plastic discarded, collected as garbage at City expense, and sent to the landfill

4. Increasing the capture rates of aluminum, glass, paper, or yard debris in Berkeley could divert more resources from landfills than collecting plastics at curbside, since plastics are a small fraction of the waste stream’s weight.

5. Existing plastic recycling practices have significant hidden problems, including the creation of unrecyclable products.

6. The question of whether to recycle plastics or not should be replaced by the question "How can we best reduce the environmental impact of packaging?"

7. Strategies that reduce the environmental impact of plastics and lead to systematic improvements in consumption and disposal practices are to:

  • Reduce the use – source reduction;
  • Reuse containers;
  • Require producers to take back resins;
  • Legislatively require recycled content;
  • Standardize labeling, and
  • Inform the public.

Note: A revision was made to the PTF report in Oct 2008 to remove sections related to chemicals that leach from plastic containers during use. Source material for those sections was not available.

Donate

Home

Support Us

Info Services

EcoCalendar
EcoDirectory
Fact Sheets
Library
Newsletter

Store

Curbside Recycling

Berkeley Farmers' Markets

Blog

Farm Fresh Choice

EcoHouse

Climate Change Action

Fiscal Sponsorship Program
Ecology Center · 2530 San Pablo Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94702
tel: 510-548-2220 · fax: 510-548-2240 · Contact Us